Comprehensive Program Review Process and Timeline

The review process for each unit involves the following timeline and steps:

Important Date	Action Items	Responsibility
August 1	Deans, Department Chairs, and Program Coordinators are notified of upcoming Comprehensive Program Review	Institutional Effectiveness and Accreditation
August - November	Comprehensive Program Review Template is downloaded Sections I and II are completed. Tables for appendix A are generated in Metabase and downloaded.	Department Chair and/or Program Coordinator
August - November	Digital Measures Reports are requested from CELT.	Department Chair and/or Program Coordinator and CELT Director (or designee)
November - February	Compile report and additional materials, complete narrative sections	Department Chair and/or Program Coordinator
February 15	Submit report to Executive Director of Institutional Effectiveness and Accreditation (IEA)	Department Chair and/or Program Coordinator
February - March	Academic Program Assessment Committee Reviews Report using CPR Review Rubric	Academic Program Assessment Committee
April 1	Executive Director IEA submits assessment report to Dean for response	Executive Director IEA
April 30	Dean submits response to the Provost	Academic Dean
May - June	Provost reviews CPR report, CPR Review Rubric, and Dean's response	Provost
May - June	Provost meets with Dean and Department Chair and/or Program Coordinator to discuss results and complete BoR report.	Provost, Dean, Department Chair and/or Program Coordinator
July 15	BoR report submitted to USG.	Executive Director IEA